User talk:Archivist Toadette/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

User talk:Archivist Toadette/Archive 4 (view source)

Revision as of 20:09, April 16, 2024

6,069 bytes added , 1 month ago

no edit summary

Archivist Toadette

39,656

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Talkarchive|User talk:Archivist Toadette}}
 {{User:Toadette the Achiever/status}}
 {{br}}
@@ Line 488: / Line 489: @@
 [[User:Spectrogram|Spectrogram]] ([[User talk:Spectrogram|talk]]) 13:54, September 10, 2022 (EDT)
 :Also feel free to reply here! {{User|Spectrogram}}
+== RE: Daisy Garden  ==
+Hey thanks for your message. I think you have misintrupted the proposal that I made back in 2016. I never state anywhere in the propsal that it should only be only major recuring locations. I state in the title of thst proposal that "Split all remaining courts/boards based on recurring places from their parent articles" and again in the desription of the proposal of the "I propose that all these sports courts and party boards are split from their parent article". The use of the word "all" indicates that every single case of a sports court based on recurring location should be split. Also I simply use the term "recuring locations" which indicates that if its based on a recuring location of any kind it is split no matter how major or minor it is. I think when meant "major" you were referring the bit where I said Bowser's Castle and Luigi's Mansion were the biggest offenders and there I was only stating those as examples they were not every example.
+Daisy Garden and Koopa Beach are both recurring locations. Daisy Garden is a recurring location based off the fact it has appeared in two games. Yes it was not a recurring location before ''Mario Sports Mix'' was released but was it was it became recurring therefore fits the definition of beinf based off a recuring lcoation. Koopa Beach was long a recuring loation before Sports Mix having appeared as as courses in the first two ''Mario Kart'' games. Therefore the proposal does actually mandate their split. The reason why i beleived i was able to split them without a discussion was because of the fact that this the proposal meant that policy now explicity stated that those acticles should be split therefore I felt i was allowed to carry out those changes without having to hold any discussions/proposals.
+Adressing your points beleving they should be merged, I understand your points regarding Daisy Garden, yes they are very similar to each other but it's not the only court that has shared name between Hoops 3-on-3 and Sports Mix: Mario Stadium Luigi's Mansion, Wario Factory and Bowser's Castle remain split. The fact that have having some courts sharing names split and others merged is incontistent and therefore makes the wiki come arcoss as unprofesstional. In regards to Koopa Beach I am strongly belive that should remain split firstly the different names it is just ''Koopa Beach'' in Hoops whilst it's named ''Koopa Troopa Beach'' in Sports mix. Secondarily fact they function differently with Hoops 3-on-3 having the Priate Ship as its gimmick and Sports Mix having the waves.
+If you beleive that the articles should be merged then I do suggest creating proposal of your own which would of if passed overturn elements of the 2016 proposal I made, changing the policy and allow these articles to merged. If you do choose to make the propsal may i suggest that you propose that all courts from Hoops 3-on-3 and Sports Mix that share their name with each other (ie the ones i mentioned in the paragraph above) to be merged not just Daisy Garden. I will be placing a oppose vote with my reasoning if you do create the proposal because i think they all are better off split but if the community sides with you and agrees that they should be merged then i will be happy with that I very much beleive this wiki should be a democracy.
+I'm not going to revert the articles back to their split form right away. I will give you 48 hours to submit a proposal on merging the articles and if you choose to do so I will leave Daisy Garden and Koopa Beach merged for the duration of the proposal. If 48 hours passes from the time I submitted this message and no propsal exists or your happy to have the artciles split then i will re-split the articles.
+I look foward to your response. {{User|NSY}}
+== Pendulum ==
+Hi, Archivist Toadette. It looks like you created the article [[Pendulum Platform]]. Do you remember where the name "Pendulum Platform" comes from? Was it used in-game anywhere? Because it is not attested in any of the guides, so I was considering moving it to "Pendulum Lift". - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 16:38, February 22, 2024 (EST)
+== Mario vs Donkey Kong ==
+It's a rearrangement. It's trying to sound like the original ''MVDK'' but it's a completely redone version (there's even a slight difference in the timing of the triple beats).
+For the identifiers, I think they can stay the same since adding the "for Nintendo Switch" part like with [[Scrapbook (Super Mario RPG for Nintendo Switch)]] would imply they're exclusive to that version of the game (which isn't the case; they're just renumbered). This would mean that for levels exclusive to the remake (Merry Mini-Land and Slippery Summit), they would get the "for Nintendo Switch" identifier. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:34, February 24, 2024 (EST)
+== Portrificationizer ==
+While I'm aware it's vandalism, there's many things on the BJaODN that are vandalism. The main important bit is that it's ''funny''. (This being one of the few cases of vandalism I've seen that actually made me laugh, mainly due to the punnish wording at the end.) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:58, March 24, 2024 (EDT)
+==The wiki's Ruby template makes the rubies unreadable on Chrome==
+While I admit that it was news to me 15min ago that an official Ruby template exists, there's just one little problem: When using a default setup of Google Chrome on Windows, with its zoom set to the default 100%, I'd personally say the template's rubies are unreadably small:
+[[File:Ruby Mario Wiki template-vs-XHTML comparison.png|350px]]
+So as far as I can tell, the only viable options are to:<br>
+A) Edit [[Template:Ruby]] as to change the font weighing from 50% to 67% (The lowest I could go in order for Chrome to make the rubies readable.<br>
+B) Utilize XHTML.<br>
+:[[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 19:55, April 16, 2024 (EDT)