Talk:K. Rool's airship (Donkey Kong 64): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
FanOfYoshi (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I'm not sure about a merge, but I ''have'' always been skeptical of using this name. The logic behind is that because there's King Kruizer III and IV, there must have been a I and a II. However, the Flying Krock is not called "King Kruizer I", and it looks nothing like the actual King Kruizers aside from being green and vaguely reptile-themed. As a result, there is no reason to assume that the ''DK64'' ship is King Kruizer II, either. It's entirely possible that King Kruizers I and II are simply things we've never seen; after all, we've seen [[Hermie III]] but not Hermie I or II. If nothing else, I support renaming this article to something that doesn't have flawed fanon built into it. Alternatively, we could just merge and add a {{tem|part conjecture}} template, similar to [[Krash]].<br>{{User:7feetunder/sig}} 19:10, March 2, 2023 (EST) | :I'm not sure about a merge, but I ''have'' always been skeptical of using this name. The logic behind is that because there's King Kruizer III and IV, there must have been a I and a II. However, the Flying Krock is not called "King Kruizer I", and it looks nothing like the actual King Kruizers aside from being green and vaguely reptile-themed. As a result, there is no reason to assume that the ''DK64'' ship is King Kruizer II, either. It's entirely possible that King Kruizers I and II are simply things we've never seen; after all, we've seen [[Hermie III]] but not Hermie I or II. If nothing else, I support renaming this article to something that doesn't have flawed fanon built into it. Alternatively, we could just merge and add a {{tem|part conjecture}} template, similar to [[Krash]].<br>{{User:7feetunder/sig}} 19:10, March 2, 2023 (EST) | ||
::I'd support it. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 13:24, August 20, 2023 (EDT) | ::I'd support it. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 13:24, August 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:::I'd also support a merge. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 08:00, January 12, 2024 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 09:00, January 12, 2024
Merge to The Flying Krock
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Conjectural name basing off a later entity. Same design as the original. Same purpose in the story as the original. I don't know why this hasn't been merged. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:23, March 2, 2023 (EST)
- I'm not sure about a merge, but I have always been skeptical of using this name. The logic behind is that because there's King Kruizer III and IV, there must have been a I and a II. However, the Flying Krock is not called "King Kruizer I", and it looks nothing like the actual King Kruizers aside from being green and vaguely reptile-themed. As a result, there is no reason to assume that the DK64 ship is King Kruizer II, either. It's entirely possible that King Kruizers I and II are simply things we've never seen; after all, we've seen Hermie III but not Hermie I or II. If nothing else, I support renaming this article to something that doesn't have flawed fanon built into it. Alternatively, we could just merge and add a {{part conjecture}} template, similar to Krash.
19:10, March 2, 2023 (EST)
- I'd support it. --
FanOfYoshi
13:24, August 20, 2023 (EDT)
- I'd also support a merge. Super Mario RPG (talk) 08:00, January 12, 2024 (EST)
- I'd support it. --
