2,855
edits
User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64: Difference between revisions
→References
m (→Moving images) |
|||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
You're still kind of struggling with this. "While no actual Bull's-Eye Banzais appear in ''Mario Kart Tour''." is not one sentence, because it's dependent on the info that follows it ("...the game introduces a red variant to the Bullet Blaster also named the Bull's-Eye Banzai.") If you wrote just that first "sentence" on its own, it wouldn't make any sense because it's not joined to anything. [[Special:Diff/2786401|You'd need to connect them with a comma]]. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:01, October 20, 2019 (EDT) | You're still kind of struggling with this. "While no actual Bull's-Eye Banzais appear in ''Mario Kart Tour''." is not one sentence, because it's dependent on the info that follows it ("...the game introduces a red variant to the Bullet Blaster also named the Bull's-Eye Banzai.") If you wrote just that first "sentence" on its own, it wouldn't make any sense because it's not joined to anything. [[Special:Diff/2786401|You'd need to connect them with a comma]]. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:01, October 20, 2019 (EDT) | ||
Your sentence structure still needs some work. Please read through this again. These should not be single sentences: | |||
*''"Three years after Shigeru Miyamoto's interview."'' What happened after the interview? Whatever happened needs to follow with a comma. If you say this by itself, this doesn't provide any information. | |||
*''"Rather than {{button|wii|A}} and {{button|wii|B}} simultaneously from the original Wii release."'' The "rather" doesn't refer to anything. The thing that was done "rather" than this needs to be connected with a comma. | |||
*''"In Wario's Woods for the SNES."'' Same as the first one. The sentence alone doesn't explain what happens in the game. | |||
I'm sorry if this might be bothersome but please don't shrug this off. I'm trying to help you because you keep making the same mistake that I explained to you, and since you're going to be editing a lot on the wiki, this is something as an editor that you need to know. <u>Don't make phrases beginning with "After...", "If...", "When...", "While..." etc. a separate sentence; you need to join them with a comma.</u> I strongly suggest taking the time to Google and read up on dependent clauses, specifically {{wp|adverbial clause}}s. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 06:55, September 19, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:Hey I was away so I was never trying to shrug it off and neither am I am trying to ignore you even if it seems unbelievable. But I guess it's time I told the truth already. I...have a learning disability and I have a lot of trouble forgetting things (due to poor memory, which I realize) even after I just learned it a lot even if I did my research and even as I talk verbally or non-verbally in a conversation with someone other than a simple hi or hey. I never know how to start a proper sentence and I hesitate sometimes if this is right or not. I'm not trying to troll you on this at all and I sometimes hate my flaws a lot and want to improve but all I do is mess up too much. Maybe I was wrong with myself trying to help and I was not cut out for it after all. I'm sorry for you wasting your time for dealing with me for every edit I make --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 19:33, September 19, 2020 (EDT) | |||
::I'm letting you know because you can fix this. It's the same structure as "Due to a glitch in the emulator, ..." which you wrote correctly with a comma ("Due to" is a subordinating conjunction like "Because...", "After...", "If..."). You'll get better once you understand the grammar of it a bit more. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:35, September 19, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:::Ohhh, thank for the encouragement. I try and proof read it a bit more. I guess maybe I can't notice the comma being there or not since it's so small than the text itself. Thanks again, I will try much harder and make this wiki better in some ways. I was quite proud finding out about the precursor to Metal Mario's (form) origins. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 23:28, September 19, 2020 (EDT) | |||
== Your latest upload == | == Your latest upload == | ||
| Line 271: | Line 284: | ||
::::[[MarioWiki:References#References to other games and references in later games]]. If an intentional connection is clear (e.g. the ones with Bluster), it's a reference; if there's no proof of one, it doesn't get added. That's all; there's no subjectivity. I've removed the ''DK64'' one since there doesn't seem to be proof anywhere of those being "nods". {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 04:32, November 5, 2019 (EST) | ::::[[MarioWiki:References#References to other games and references in later games]]. If an intentional connection is clear (e.g. the ones with Bluster), it's a reference; if there's no proof of one, it doesn't get added. That's all; there's no subjectivity. I've removed the ''DK64'' one since there doesn't seem to be proof anywhere of those being "nods". {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 04:32, November 5, 2019 (EST) | ||
"Same method", especially something as general as standing on a shell, doesn't automatically make it a reference. Please read through MW:References again. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:03, March 14, 2020 (EDT) | "Same method", especially something as general as standing on a shell, doesn't automatically make it a reference. Please read through MW:References again. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:03, March 14, 2020 (EDT) | ||
I don't think you're fully understanding what's considered a direct reference as you've been adding far too many "references" that are merely similarities to something in past games, mostly ones that aren't likely enough to be intentional. For example, in addition to what I said [[Special:Diff/4014784|here]], Fast Dash could have simply been fast speed without specifically referencing Toad, the only similarities Missile Megs share with the diagonal Bullet Bills and ''SMS'' Purple Bullet Bills are the direction of movement and colour/bared teeth respectively, and Yoshi getting knocked back and stunned is just a common knockback animation (and you added the same ''NSMB2'' Tanooki Mario reference for no reason again, even though musical changes have existed since ''SMW'' with Yoshi, a recurring element as I mentioned in the linked summary). All of these are just ordinary traits being twisted into what ''could'' be references just because previous games did them too. Please stop treating everything as a reference and bring them up on the talk page to get opinions on them first before claiming them as such on the article. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 09:03, October 20, 2023 (EDT) | |||
::And I don't think you and I seem to have good terms of agreement to one another I've been noticing just because we don't think the same view to one another and see each other as conflictive rivals or something since you always seem to have beef towards me as a "negative annoyance". What other game had Piranha Plants tilting their heads at the player considering their are bits of ''Yoshi's Island'' references? How is Toad's fast speed not intentional but a simple high-jump with a scuttle is a reference to Luigi because we all know him for that when that may as well be a coincidence since it's a simple high-jump? Missle Megs are not just purple (even with an identical hue and shade) and have closed teeth they also have fins like the ''SMS'' purple Bullet Bills on vertical and horizontal sides. I am strongly aware Yoshi (as a big fan of him) is the one that added changes to the music first since ''SMW'' but the difference is that he is more of a mount while ''NSMB2'' is specifically the first time an actual power-up changes the music at all. At this point I'm pretty much convinced you will just see lots of "references" as coincidence from me in particular and even if I discuss this the opinions will be "conflictive arguments" they think "no, this is right, no this isn't, vice versa" from one another that there will be disagreements from what they consider their own view to be correct out of bias. At this point I'm just done and think it's best I leave this site after all that seems to make me look stupid. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 11:53, October 20, 2023 (EDT) | |||
== RE: Peach Explorer Outfit == | == RE: Peach Explorer Outfit == | ||
| Line 317: | Line 333: | ||
{{lastwarn}} | {{lastwarn}} | ||
What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
:Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because | :Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because Doc von Schmeltwick was edit warring as well, even if you don't agree with it. You are basically over powering your admin status just to frame me out. I don't even care if you block me, even if you really hate what I'm saying here. Just do it if you are really wanting too. I'm doing the best I can and I realize I'm not perfect but I want to help but you know what, but I don't think I'm needed here after all since people want to conflict me so many times, even if no one cares. --[[User:Gamermakerguy|Gamermakerguy]] ([[User talk:Gamermakerguy|talk]]) 14:37, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
::I was not edit warring, I deliberately waited after your last revert to see if anyone else would instead. Also, TTA isn't an admin. ''Also'', the "woe is me" type of thing isn't going to get you anywhere. If you have a problem with the warning, appeal it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:41, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ::I was not edit warring, I deliberately waited after your last revert to see if anyone else would instead. Also, TTA isn't an admin. ''Also'', the "woe is me" type of thing isn't going to get you anywhere. If you have a problem with the warning, appeal it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:41, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
::'''(edit conflict)''' No, that wasn't my intent. Even ''if'' Doc was also at fault for edit warring, at that point you should have instead left a message on [[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|her talk page]] clearly explaining why you felt that said information was needed in the first place; instead, you chose to simply revert back to your preferred version for the third time. Also, what does a status as an admin have to do with this? I'm clearly not an admin, nor am I deliberately trying to undermine their authority either, so I won't be the one to block you in the end even if I tried. I'm also not "hating" what you're saying, just that what you're saying is highly contentious and thus needed to be discussed before jumping to any conclusions. That's literally all I'm trying I'm say; everything else is irrelevant. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:48, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ::'''(edit conflict)''' No, that wasn't my intent. Even ''if'' Doc was also at fault for edit warring, at that point you should have instead left a message on [[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|her talk page]] clearly explaining why you felt that said information was needed in the first place; instead, you chose to simply revert back to your preferred version for the third time. Also, what does a status as an admin have to do with this? I'm clearly not an admin, nor am I deliberately trying to undermine their authority either, so I won't be the one to block you in the end even if I tried. I'm also not "hating" what you're saying, just that what you're saying is highly contentious and thus needed to be discussed before jumping to any conclusions. That's literally all I'm trying I'm say; everything else is irrelevant. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:48, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
| Line 430: | Line 446: | ||
When you move an image, be sure to check "What links here" from the original file name and correct the links, then mark the redirect for deletion. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:20, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | When you move an image, be sure to check "What links here" from the original file name and correct the links, then mark the redirect for deletion. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:20, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | ||
:Thanks for the tip, though I made sure it was only in the ''Super Mario Galaxy'' Gallery, though I don't know how to delete the redirects formal names --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 17:29, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | :Thanks for the tip, though I made sure it was only in the ''Super Mario Galaxy'' Gallery, though I don't know how to delete the redirects formal names --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 17:29, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | ||
::You can't actually delete them yourself, you mark them with {{tem|delete}} and an admin will get to it. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:37, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:::Understood there, thank you! --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 19:39, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | |||
==Blocked== | |||
Hey. So, I noticed that you had blocked me on DeviantArt a long time ago and that I couldn't understand why. Anyways, I'm just here to kindly ask you if you could just unblock me. I mean, I've been doing quite better for the most part and that I feel bad for my past actions (i.e. venting about Toadette's explorer outfit; I'm over it now). Also, a couple months ago, I even [https://www.deviantart.com/karatetoad/journal/34-An-Attempted-Apology-to-KoopshiKingGeoshi-817142791 tried to apologize to you.] So, um...I know this won't make up for everything I've done, but can you please unblock me on DA or am I blocked from you on that site indefinitely? | |||
{{User:TheKarateToad/sig}} 12:39, July 16, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:I accept your apology and willing to give you a second chance. It's true that I did block you because of your childish hypocritical ways back then which got me pretty fed up despite trying to put a lot of patients in with Iwatchcartoons715 (since I saw you two having problems with the Toadette outfit issue too), but I'm glad you matured and accepted Odyssey getting references and also being a great man. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 15:22, July 17, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Thank you so much. That means a lot to me. :) | |||
{{User:TheKarateToad/sig}} 21:55, July 17, 2020 (EDT) | |||
==New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe Athletic Theme Change… Source?== | |||
Where's your source for this? I've compared them and the instruments sound identical. | |||
== Other peoples' proposals == | |||
Hello, it's generally considered good form to wait a week or two (or at least ask) before enacting another user's proposal. I can't exactly edit while I'm at my job, so I couldn't do so within that time frame. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:42, September 19, 2021 (EDT) | |||
:Oh... I didn't know I had to wait despite the settlement was done on the proposal. Alright, I'll remember next time then. I apologize in advance. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 23:49, September 19, 2021 (EDT) | |||
== Mario Movie music == | |||
"Please see my summary in the history, thanks" | |||
Yes, I saw your summary, and I disagreed with it and firmly stand by that disagreement. | |||
For one thing, the two pieces are not all that similar, and this would be an incredibly obscure tune to reference in the Mario movie. Like I said before, if there's any tune from Super Mario RPG, Paper Mario, or Mario & Luigi to reference, you'd think they'd pick a much more recognizable one. Something like… the main theme of Origami King would make way more sense if they wanted to make reference to the spinoffs in a different scene. The movie largely sticks with themes from the mainline Mario series. When it does deviate and quote the spinoffs, they tend to just quote main themes (like Luigi's Mansion and Donkey Kong Country). Or in the case of Mario Kart, they quote specific themes that match the current scenario they're in, such as the kart customization and Rainbow Road segments. | |||
Now, I'm not completely denying the possibility. If Brian Tyler comes out and says he's deliberately trying to reference Paper Mario: The Origami King, then fine, I'll concede it. However, as it stands now, there's been no official confirmation, and much of the "evidence" to support this claim is "It's my personal opinion that they're the same." To me, that's not good enough to make the outright declaration that this soundtrack is directly referencing anything, as any opinion stating the opposite can very easily invalidate it. Hence, it's better to just leave it out for now. | |||
- Mario54671 | |||
:After some consideration a bit more from reading your reply to me on here, I decided to agree with everything you said now, after all I did let it go with GBA Riverside Park's potential motifs out no problem. Sorry if it sounded like I came to you in a very snarky way the way my tone may seem or sound from my response to you, I've decided to just let it go for the time being, I will admit that I do get a little bit defensive when people conflict with my edits even when I factual give enough good evidence, which happened to me in the past, I will wait until Brian Tyler says something about that "scary" track even though I never expected [[Wario's Battle Canyon]] to be added to the track even if the ''Mario Party'' series is more closer to the mainline games anyway and a bit obscure to go with for a random ''Mario Party'' track like that one, the difference being he confirmed that one. I did listen from a podcast that ''[[The Super Mario Bros. Movie]]'' does not take any liberties from the Mario RPGs which I can understand you more now. --[[User:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|KingGeoshiKoopshi64]] ([[User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64|talk]]) 00:28, April 26, 2023 (EDT) | |||
== RE: Shady Koopas vs. Underground Koopas == | |||
I was going to explain the edit after I was done for the day but didn't have time. If you want someone to understand the point you're trying to get across, I would suggest not writing a giant wall of really hard-to-read text expecting them to have the time to read it all. From what I can tell, it seems like you're just overanalysing and reaching in trying to find a connection between the Shady Koopas and underground Koopas without it being as obvious as the Gloombas and underground Goombas, when the point behind the edit was that the Koopas look similar, when they clearly don't ([[File:SMB NES Blue Koopa Troopa Walking.gif|30px]][[File:Sky Blue Troopa.png|30px]]) in the same way the Goombas do ([[File:SMBBlueGoomba.gif|30px]][[File:PMTTYDGloomba.png|30px]]). Even if it's possible they intended for it to be what a Koopa looks like in shade, it could have been a design separate from underground Koopas since they hardly look similar. If its shell was as dark as the Gloombas and it had darker skin as opposed to paler/desaturated-coloured skin (I disagree it would have blended in with the collar and sunglasses), then I'd agree it'd look similar or even be a reference. The ''SSBU'' Piranha Plant costume similarity is notable because they would have likely based any of the seven alternate costumes on something (as most costumes are), and the underground Piranha Plants would be the closest. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:44, May 16, 2023 (EDT) | |||
== RE: MKSC Peach's Castle == | |||
Your listing of the differences between them is exactly why it doesn't make sense to compare them, when the similarities you're describing are already common traits in its other appearances (with some minor differences because not every design is going to look exactly the same), [[:File:Peach's Castle PM.png|including ''Paper Mario'']] - if anything, it's more based on this design, especially with the central tower, both games being by the same developer and given its appearance on Rainbow Road. Obviously it would be based on the ''SM64'' design in some way (since that was the design's first appearance), so it's not worth noting to say that. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 23:21, May 27, 2023 (EDT) | |||
:Then it should be the icon image being compared, not the background image. Going back to the latter, you're using the ''MKDS'' image as reference and not the [[:File:MKSC Peach Circuit Starting Line.png|original ''Super Circuit'' one]]. There are also differences between it and the ''SM64'' boxart as you've pointed out, more than ''Paper Mario'' in fact (''MKSC'''s windows are closed unlike the boxart, while it has blue flags like ''PM'', and it's hard to tell what the design above the door depicts), so why is the boxart being compared here? I now realise after looking over the castle's appearances it has the trapezium roof (not hexagonal) and tower bases that weren't commonly used at the time, but I still don't think it makes sense saying it's based on the boxart as a whole (again, if anything, "as a whole" it would be more ''Paper Mario''). Either way, the specifics should be covered on the actual castle's article. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 11:32, May 28, 2023 (EDT) | |||