User talk:Booster

Booster Talk
Archive 1 (1-50)

Venus Fire Trap

Maybe you could upload a venus fire trap cartoon from the episode Tag Team trouble from TAoSMB3.F g

Can you also upload a spark cartoon image?F g

I'm not

Trying to overwhelm you but can you upload a single albatoss and a tweeter in their regular appearance?F g

Brawling in Brawl

Hey Booster, my FC is 3866-7707-1966 for Brawl. Don't bother sending me yours, cuz I see it on your page. Maybe we could fight not this weekend, but the next weekend?? Glitchman (talk · contribs)

About the forum

Hey, booster, I can't get the antibot thing on the forums. I put in the right answer, but it always comes out wrong. ps. I never got my activation email for the actual wiki. my email is zmcginley@cts-bethesda.com. just be sure that you don't give my email to anyone else. please email me with your reply.

Proposal deletion?

Somebody keeps deleting my proposal about making character pages have content that other Mario character pages have. I'd rather not do it by my self but...

Sincerely, Nintendofan146

I'm sorry, but you've confused mii further... Should I just go do what my proposal said?

Seriously, when would you want to fight?? Glitchman (talk · contribs)

Would about 1 and a half hours be OK, cuz I'm supposed to be doing homework now. Glitchman (talk · contribs) BTW, I'd prefer if you post messages on my current talk page.

Cool :P Glitchman (talk · contribs)

Good matches :D I can't believe I lost so many..but I will return!! And sorry I left, didn't mean to be a sore loser or anything but I had to go to dinner. We'll have to have a rematch sometime!! Glitchman (talk · contribs)

Stub?

Is there some rule that all stubs become deleted? As you did to Peel Out and Stump Change? Those were mini-games from MP7. Besides, there was a proposal about that allowing those pages, remember? Marcelagus (T • C • E)

Oh, ok. Well, I just thought that someone would have to start it, because those articles had 88 pages linking to them. Oh well. I don't have the game, so I can't really "put an effort" into it, either. And no, I was not doing it to increase my article tally, Booster. Articles are better off gone than short, I suppose. Anyway, thanks for clearing it up, though.Marcelagus (T • C • E)

that user...

look at sockpuppet 18 (talk). obviously might be a sockpuppet of another similar account. ¢oincoll€ctor 00:53, 25 April 2008 (EDT) looks so suspicious :[

Could you give me a hand?

Hello Booster this is my first request to you (or anyone else) but I was wondering if you could take a look at article "WORLD 2-5 (NSMB)"for me and judge if it is still a stub (if it isn't you can remove the "stub logo"). As you probably know I'm new here and this is my first major edit and I have added a lot of info. If it has sufficient information (or still needs more) please reply on my talk page.

Thank you so much,

                    User:MC Hammer Bro.

Hi there! Can I ask you a favor? Can you please talk to Fixitup? We resolved the Baby Daisy conflict on the talk page while he was gone and now he's making a relationship section again on the page, and he's starting to get annoying. He's also saying I'm starting an edit war with him, even though the problem was resolved. SJ derp :P

?

Could you please try to pay more attention to what's going on? As you can see, I DID stop continuing Toadette4evur's flame war. They continued it. You can see this as they are the last person to make an edit on the page. It was resolved, and the outcome was us keeping it. Maybe next time you should check up on things a little better. Fixitup

Is it ok that I removed his comments off my talk page. Also, the resolution I am talking about happened while he was offline. SJ derp :P

You can see on the talk page that it hasn't been resolved. It HAD been, until Toadette4evur started an edit war. Fixitup

Here's what happened: He went offline for a while, then me and some of the other users involved agreed that we could move the Relation article to the trivia. Then when he came back he threw a fit and kept adding the section back, then I contacted you and another Sysop in case one of you was too busy. I stopped after that but he continued contacting people. Then he started making rude comments to me and a friend of mine, so I removed his comments off my talk page, and requested that he not be allowed to comment on my talk page. Then he started saying I was breaking the rules, and here we are now. SJ derp :P

That's so off. I didn't throw a fit, and I'm the one that said I was not going to continue in an edit war. I started contacting more people because Toadette4evur started going around like the more people they told their side of the story to, the more would agree with them without knowing what actually happened. They then removed my comments, which didn't contain any inappropriate commentary, from their talk page. Last time I checked, that IS against the rules. Fixitup

Could you block him from my talk page, please? SJ derp :P

I'm just gonna post here where you'll both see this. The Relationship section is valid. Many other articles have one. If I may ask, what is WRONG with it, Toadette4evur? If you have a vaild point I'll take it into consideration. And no, I can't stop Fixitup from posting on your talk page without blocking him entirely. -- Booster

That's ok, I put that I don't want his comments on my talk page in my talk page rules. SJ derp :P