MarioWiki:Main Page talk archive 19: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "MK Race Courses" to "MK race courses"
m (Text replacement - "MK Race Courses" to "MK race courses")
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Main Page Talk}}
{{Main Page Talk}}
{{talkarchive|Talk:Main Page}}


==Individual Pages==
==Individual Pages==
Hmmmm.... Question: Is there anything saying we can't make individual pages for [[Subspace Army]] ememies? Because we only have [[Jyk|one]]. Not counting [[Primid]]. {{User:InfectedShroom/sig}}
Hmmmm.... Question: Is there anything saying we can't make individual pages for [[Subspace Army]] ememies? Because we only have [[Jyk|one]]. Not counting [[Primid]]. {{User:InfectedShroom/sig}}
:Only that old importance policy might, but no one's paying attention to that anyway, so nothing's stopping you. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 01:58, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
:Only that old importance policy might, but no one's paying attention to that anyway, so nothing's stopping you. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 01:58, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
Line 22: Line 22:


== Sockpuppeter ==
== Sockpuppeter ==
looks like we have a new one: smoke.
looks like we have a new one: smoke.


Line 43: Line 42:


== "Low-Resolution Images" ==
== "Low-Resolution Images" ==
I've noticed that part of our free use policy for artwork and screenshots states that images are to be low resolution, bolding added by me:
I've noticed that part of our free use policy for artwork and screenshots states that images are to be low resolution, bolding added by me:


Line 50: Line 48:
"This is a screenshot of a copyrighted computer or video game, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. '''It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots for identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question or the copyrighted character(s) depicted on the screenshot in question qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law,''' as such display does not significantly impede the right of the copyright holder to sell the copyrighted material, is not being used to turn a profit in this context, and presents ideas that cannot be exhibited otherwise. See Copyrights and fair use rationale."
"This is a screenshot of a copyrighted computer or video game, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. '''It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots for identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question or the copyrighted character(s) depicted on the screenshot in question qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law,''' as such display does not significantly impede the right of the copyright holder to sell the copyrighted material, is not being used to turn a profit in this context, and presents ideas that cannot be exhibited otherwise. See Copyrights and fair use rationale."


I think we need to set some boundaries as to what images are considered low/web resolution.  Just to clarify, I'm talking about really, really big images, like ones that don't even fit on a 1600x1400 monitor, like [[:Image:MPDSMario.jpg]]. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 01:40, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
I think we need to set some boundaries as to what images are considered low/web resolution.  Just to clarify, I'm talking about really, really big images, like ones that don't even fit on a 1600x1400 monitor, like {{fake link|Image:MPDSMario.jpg}}. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 01:40, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
:This low-resolution rule is mainly intended for making companies unable to completely ban you from reporting about their stuff. Nintendo is however much more lax about showing their images around the web. It only has a set number of purposes you may not use them for:
:This low-resolution rule is mainly intended for making companies unable to completely ban you from reporting about their stuff. Nintendo is however much more lax about showing their images around the web. It only has a set number of purposes you may not use them for:
:<blockquote>All content on this website, including articles, artwork, screen shots, graphics, logos, digital downloads and other files, may not be used on any other web site, in any publications, in public performances, in connection with any product or service that is not Nintendo's, in any manner that is likely to cause confusion among customers, in any manner that disparages or discredits Nintendo, or in any manner that is otherwise exploitative for any commercial purpose or that otherwise infringes Nintendo's intellectual property rights.</blockquote>
:<blockquote>All content on this website, including articles, artwork, screen shots, graphics, logos, digital downloads and other files, may not be used on any other web site, in any publications, in public performances, in connection with any product or service that is not Nintendo's, in any manner that is likely to cause confusion among customers, in any manner that disparages or discredits Nintendo, or in any manner that is otherwise exploitative for any commercial purpose or that otherwise infringes Nintendo's intellectual property rights.</blockquote>
Line 60: Line 58:


== "Sub-species" ==
== "Sub-species" ==
I think the wiki is way too lenient on giving out the status of a "sub-species" to almost everything. Sure, a [[Paragoomba]] is a sub-species of [[Goomba]], because it has evolved wings. But why should a [[Sad Dry Bones]] be a sub-species of a [[Dry Bones]]? They are exactly the same, simply in a different mood. Also, concerning ''Super Mario RPG'' enemies, [[Gorgon]] is considered a sub-species of [[Enigma]]. Why? Because the Enigma is the first to appear in the game? They are similar, without doubt, but that doesn't qualifiy for being sub-species of each other. On terms of [[wikipedia:Subspecies|Subspecies]], all have to be treated equally as well. So "regular Goomba without anything" is itself a subspecies of "Goomba".<br>
I think the wiki is way too lenient on giving out the status of a "sub-species" to almost everything. Sure, a [[Paragoomba]] is a sub-species of [[Goomba]], because it has evolved wings. But why should a [[Sad Dry Bones]] be a sub-species of a [[Dry Bones]]? They are exactly the same, simply in a different mood. Also, concerning ''Super Mario RPG'' enemies, [[Gorgon]] is considered a sub-species of [[Enigma]]. Why? Because the Enigma is the first to appear in the game? They are similar, without doubt, but that doesn't qualifiy for being sub-species of each other. On terms of [[wikipedia:Subspecies|Subspecies]], all have to be treated equally as well. So "regular Goomba without anything" is itself a subspecies of "Goomba".<br>
I don't think the whole concept of sub-species really fits into Mario games. Paragoombas lose their wings when jumped upon. That doesn't change them in any zoological way. The term "species" shouldn't be used in that case at all. What about "variety"? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:05, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
I don't think the whole concept of sub-species really fits into Mario games. Paragoombas lose their wings when jumped upon. That doesn't change them in any zoological way. The term "species" shouldn't be used in that case at all. What about "variety"? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:05, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
Line 69: Line 66:
:::Just that I should have been more careful with the term when I first used it two years ago.
:::Just that I should have been more careful with the term when I first used it two years ago.


:::That's two terms I've invented that have caused problems. -_-' -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 16:01, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
:::That's two terms I've invented that have caused problems. -_-' -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 16:01, 4 May 2008 (EDT)


== Chat problem ==
== Chat problem ==
The mariowiki chatroom lost its chanserv registration and there were no users so the system op-ed me by mistake.  Now the chatroom is gone.  Anybody know what happend?--{{User:dummmmmmy/sig}} 10:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
The mariowiki chatroom lost its chanserv registration and there were no users so the system op-ed me by mistake.  Now the chatroom is gone.  Anybody know what happend?--{{User:dummmmmmy/sig}} 10:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
:Not sure what happened, but I'm in there right now &ndash; ChanServ there and Steve is oped. The server probably hiccuped, making ChanServ leave from all channels for a short time. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 10:38, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
:Not sure what happened, but I'm in there right now &ndash; ChanServ there and Steve is oped. The server probably hiccuped, making ChanServ leave from all channels for a short time. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 10:38, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
Line 83: Line 79:


== Chat nick theft as a DoS attack, I need help ==
== Chat nick theft as a DoS attack, I need help ==
Some guy in chat registered the nicks i use so i could not use them in chat.  I have no acess to them at all because some nick abuser regstered the nick that wasnt his.  Anybody know what to do because I need help.--{{User:dummmmmmy/sig}} 13:34, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Some guy in chat registered the nicks i use so i could not use them in chat.  I have no acess to them at all because some nick abuser regstered the nick that wasnt his.  Anybody know what to do because I need help.--{{User:dummmmmmy/sig}} 13:34, 11 May 2008 (EDT)


Line 93: Line 88:


==Player==
==Player==
Okay, I've noticed a recurring grammatical problem in almost every article. Such as:
Okay, I've noticed a recurring grammatical problem in almost every article. Such as:
<blockquote>When the player decides to stop here, they will meet Pokey, the guardian of the desert.</blockquote>
<blockquote>When the player decides to stop here, they will meet Pokey, the guardian of the desert.</blockquote>


I pulled that from [[Pokey (MPA)|this article]] before I changed it. Note how it says "they" after "player". This is not correct; it should be "he or she" (which is what I changed it to). Now, this isn't a problem strictly on this site &ndash; I've found it everywhere. "Player" is singular, while "they" is plural; these to words don't grammatically compliment each other. "Player" - "he/she; him/her" (depending on the context) &ndash; "players" - "they; them" (depending on the context). I know this probably seems like a small issue, but I wanted to point out the correct way to write it; after all &ndash; we want the most professional writing we can get. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 12:33, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
I pulled that from {{fake link|this article}} before I changed it. Note how it says "they" after "player". This is not correct; it should be "he or she" (which is what I changed it to). Now, this isn't a problem strictly on this site &ndash; I've found it everywhere. "Player" is singular, while "they" is plural; these to words don't grammatically compliment each other. "Player" - "he/she; him/her" (depending on the context) &ndash; "players" - "they; them" (depending on the context). I know this probably seems like a small issue, but I wanted to point out the correct way to write it; after all &ndash; we want the most professional writing we can get. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 12:33, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
:It's the [[wikipedia:Singular_they|"singular" they]] problem. Basically, "they" is used in order to mean "he or she". I never really got the meaning of it. In German, you can simply use "he" all over because the word "player" is male. :/ - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:38, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
:It's the [[wikipedia:Singular_they|"singular" they]] problem. Basically, "they" is used in order to mean "he or she". I never really got the meaning of it. In German, you can simply use "he" all over because the word "player" is male. :/ - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:38, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
::I rest my case. It just never sounded right. =| {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig|Thanks, Cobold.}}
::I rest my case. It just never sounded right. =| {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig|Thanks, Cobold.}}
Line 110: Line 104:


== Nintendo ==
== Nintendo ==
Uh why did you guys put the nintendo recalls a poisonous series of mario-pins on the front page?{{User:Fg/sig}}
Uh why did you guys put the nintendo recalls a poisonous series of mario-pins on the front page?{{User:Fg/sig}}
:Read it as: We don't have any news worth noting. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:56, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
:Read it as: We don't have any news worth noting. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:56, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
::Poisonous pins? What next, spiked wiimotes? -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 18:20, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
::Poisonous pins? What next, spiked wiimotes? -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 18:20, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
:::Speaking of, they should be mentioned on the merchandise page.  I have an image of them on my desktop waiting for me to get around to that. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:30, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
:::Speaking of, they should be mentioned on the merchandise page.  I have an image of them on my desktop waiting for me to get around to that. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 18:30, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
::::The pins or the spiked wiimotes? -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 18:45, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
::::The pins or the spiked wiimotes? -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 18:45, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
:::The pins, although I really want one of those Wiimotes now. Here's some sources: [http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/pinrecall.jsp Nintendo], [http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08257.html CPSC]. The second one has an image. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 17:18, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:::The pins, although I really want one of those Wiimotes now. Here's some sources: [http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/pinrecall.jsp Nintendo], [http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml08/08257.html CPSC]. The second one has an image. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 17:18, 23 May 2008 (EDT)


Line 128: Line 121:
** Link only the immediately related articles while hiding the rest, like in the case of <nowiki>{{Johnny Cash}}</nowiki>.
** Link only the immediately related articles while hiding the rest, like in the case of <nowiki>{{Johnny Cash}}</nowiki>.
* They should not be too small. A navigational template with less than a handful of links can easily be replaced by "See also" sections, or relevant <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{see also}}</nowiki> links within the articles' sections.</blockquote>
* They should not be too small. A navigational template with less than a handful of links can easily be replaced by "See also" sections, or relevant <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{see also}}</nowiki> links within the articles' sections.</blockquote>
- [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Navigational templates|Wikipedia:Navigational templates]].<br><br>
- [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Navigational templates|Wikipedia:Navigational templates]].<br><br>
We at the MarioWiki are guilty of neglecting many of these rules. I think we need a general reconception of how to handle our navigation templates.
We at the MarioWiki are guilty of neglecting many of these rules. I think we need a general reconception of how to handle our navigation templates.
#Templates like {{tem|Yoshi}}, {{tem|SSB}} and {{tem|SMRPG_Enemy}} contradict the first of Wikipedia's points. They immsenly cram links into one template which are more or less not related to the current article. A SSB character template should, for example, only linking from playable character to other playable characters. [[Primid]] or [[Hammer Bro.]] are not related to playable characters enough to warrant a link in a related template. The same goes for the Yoshi enemies and the SMRPG enemies. The Yoshi enemy template could be split apart into sections for each game, or each enemy class if that gives enough links.
#Templates like {{tem|Yoshi}}, {{tem|SSB}} and <nowiki>{{SMRPG_Enemy}}</nowiki> contradict the first of Wikipedia's points. They immsenly cram links into one template which are more or less not related to the current article. A SSB character template should, for example, only linking from playable character to other playable characters. [[Primid]] or [[Hammer Bro.]] are not related to playable characters enough to warrant a link in a related template. The same goes for the Yoshi enemies and the SMRPG enemies. The Yoshi enemy template could be split apart into sections for each game, or each enemy class if that gives enough links.
#Templates like {{tem|Racecourses}} and {{tem|MP}} are immensly huge. They violate the second rule: they could easily be split up into one template for each game, and thus be much easier to handle, read, and you could actually find what you are looking for. Smaller racecourses templates could be arranged in columns for the cups, and list the retro tracks of Mario Kart DS and Wii as well.
#Templates like {{tem|MK race courses}} and {{tem|MP}} are immensly huge. They violate the second rule: they could easily be split up into one template for each game, and thus be much easier to handle, read, and you could actually find what you are looking for. Smaller racecourses templates could be arranged in columns for the cups, and list the retro tracks of Mario Kart DS and Wii as well.
#Templates like {{tem|Human}}, {{tem|Royalty}}, {{tem|Magic}} and {{tem|Undead}} give you an immense list of links you probably don't care about. They don't even provide links of articles you would want to check if you are already reading one with this template. [[Mario]] can do magic, but only for fireballs and similar things. He is not, like [[Kamek]] or [[Zelda]], someone who dominantly uses magic and thus can be called a magician. Mario isn't worth of being on the Magicians template. These templates only give you a list of very vaguely related stuff. This is not what navigation templates are for - we have categories for that, guys!
#Templates like {{tem|Human}}, {{fake link|Royalty}}, {{fake link|Magic}} and {{fake link|Undead}} give you an immense list of links you probably don't care about. They don't even provide links of articles you would want to check if you are already reading one with this template. [[Mario]] can do magic, but only for fireballs and similar things. He is not, like [[Kamek]] or [[Zelda]], someone who dominantly uses magic and thus can be called a magician. Mario isn't worth of being on the Magicians template. These templates only give you a list of very vaguely related stuff. This is not what navigation templates are for - we have categories for that, guys!
#{{tem|8-Bit Club}} is way too small. Even more so, it completely overlaps with {{tem|Shy Guys}}. It doesn't do anything to help you finding an additional, related article.
#{{fake link|8-Bit Club}} is way too small. Even more so, it completely overlaps with {{tem|Shy Guys}}. It doesn't do anything to help you finding an additional, related article.
#{{tem|SMK}}, {{tem|MKDD}} and {{tem|Mario Kart Wii Playable Characters}} overlap heavily. They all contain Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Koopa Troopa and Yoshi, and two of them contain Donkey Kong, Diddy Kong, Wario, Waluigi, Daisy, Toadette, King Boo, Birdo, and some I forgot. They take up space but don't really provide any additional information for someone viewing Mario's page. They could simply be categories as well.
#<nowiki>{{SMK}}, {{MKDD}} and {{Mario Kart Wii Playable Characters}}</nowiki> overlap heavily. They all contain Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Koopa Troopa and Yoshi, and two of them contain Donkey Kong, Diddy Kong, Wario, Waluigi, Daisy, Toadette, King Boo, Birdo, and some I forgot. They take up space but don't really provide any additional information for someone viewing Mario's page. They could simply be categories as well.
We should work out a new style for templates and categories, to prevent having navigation sections like of the main characters, which are simply there but hopeless to navigate in or find anything that might else be of interest for you. {{tem|SMSS}} doesn't really need to link to Mario (!), for example. Thus, we could remove it from his page. In the end, those templates would turn out usable. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 19:09, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
We should work out a new style for templates and categories, to prevent having navigation sections like of the main characters, which are simply there but hopeless to navigate in or find anything that might else be of interest for you. {{tem|SMSS}} doesn't really need to link to Mario (!), for example. Thus, we could remove it from his page. In the end, those templates would turn out usable. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 19:09, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
<br><br>
<br><br>
Line 146: Line 139:


==Did you know?==
==Did you know?==
Although the did you know section states that Waluigi is heavy character on Mario Kart Wii, this is untrue. The charecters are not light, medium, and heavy, they are small, medium and large. {{unsigned|Paperwaluigi}}
Although the did you know section states that Waluigi is heavy character on Mario Kart Wii, this is untrue. The charecters are not light, medium, and heavy, they are small, medium and large. {{unsigned|Paperwaluigi}}
:That's true. You can edit {{tem|DidYouKnow}} by yourself, by the way. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:54, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
:That's true. You can edit {{tem|DidYouKnow}} by yourself, by the way. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 12:54, 18 May 2008 (EDT)


==Problem with Firefox==
==Problem with Firefox==
Since yesterday, the wiki has huge trouble loading when I'm using Firefox. For some reasons, the wiki work fine with IE6 (Fine... Well, as fine as IE6 can work :|), but it doesn,t even bother to load with Firefox. Am I the only one with this problem? {{User:Blitzwing/sig}}
Since yesterday, the wiki has huge trouble loading when I'm using Firefox. For some reasons, the wiki work fine with IE6 (Fine... Well, as fine as IE6 can work :|), but it doesn,t even bother to load with Firefox. Am I the only one with this problem? {{User:Blitzwing/sig}}
:No, I am too. This site has been running hideously slow. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 20:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
:No, I am too. This site has been running hideously slow. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 20:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)


==Away==
==Away==
 
Just in case anyone missed the note on my [[User:Ghost Jam|Userpage]], I will be unavailable from about noon tomorrow until next Monday night, due to attending [http://www.fanime.com/ FanimeCon 2008]. Any messages to me will be answered then. -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 01:57, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Just in case anyone missed the note on my [[User:Ghost Jam|Userpage]], I will be unavailable from about noon tomorrow until next Monday night, due to attending [http://www.fanime.com/ FanimeCon 2008]. Any messages to me will be answered then. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 01:57, 22 May 2008 (EDT)


== Vandal ==
== Vandal ==
I have no idea if this is the right place to put this, but [[User:LD851|LD851]] has been vandalizing several pages. Look at his (or her) contributions, and just look at a few and then you'll see what I mean. He (or she) needs a warning. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}} 17:13, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
I have no idea if this is the right place to put this, but [[User:LD851|LD851]] has been vandalizing several pages. Look at his (or her) contributions, and just look at a few and then you'll see what I mean. He (or she) needs a warning. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}} 17:13, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:That user is already blocked. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 17:27, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:That user is already blocked. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 17:27, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Line 166: Line 155:


== Page for "Alternate Dimension" ==
== Page for "Alternate Dimension" ==
I was wondering, for those of you who saw the ''[[Super Mario Bros. (film)|Super Mario Bros.]]'' film, would you think it wise to create a page for the alternate dimension that includes [[Dinohatten]]?  I am aware that the term Alternate Dimension, even though it is the most official since [[Toad]] uses it in the movie, is not specific to the movie: it also appears within the Wario series and there is of course the fact that [[Smithy]] comes from an alternate dimension.  So, here's what I'm thinking: how about a page, named alternate dimension, that has a section for each of the alternate dimensions in the Mario series?  There's three I know of so far, but I'm pretty sure ''[[Super Paper Mario]]'' has something about alternate dimensions, yes? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 17:25, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
I was wondering, for those of you who saw the ''[[Super Mario Bros. (film)|Super Mario Bros.]]'' film, would you think it wise to create a page for the alternate dimension that includes [[Dinohatten]]?  I am aware that the term Alternate Dimension, even though it is the most official since [[Toad]] uses it in the movie, is not specific to the movie: it also appears within the Wario series and there is of course the fact that [[Smithy]] comes from an alternate dimension.  So, here's what I'm thinking: how about a page, named alternate dimension, that has a section for each of the alternate dimensions in the Mario series?  There's three I know of so far, but I'm pretty sure ''[[Super Paper Mario]]'' has something about alternate dimensions, yes? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 17:25, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:I wouldn't see a problem with making this page. ''Super Paper Mario'' definitely does have a big part with alternate dimensions. I'm up to chapter 5-3 of the game, so I could help somewhat. In case someone reads this and hasn't played the game, I'll merely say that [[The Void]] tears a large hole into all alternate dimensions, leading to their imminent destruction &ndash; if I say more, I might ruin the storyline. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 18:49, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
:I wouldn't see a problem with making this page. ''Super Paper Mario'' definitely does have a big part with alternate dimensions. I'm up to chapter 5-3 of the game, so I could help somewhat. In case someone reads this and hasn't played the game, I'll merely say that [[The Void]] tears a large hole into all alternate dimensions, leading to their imminent destruction &ndash; if I say more, I might ruin the storyline. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 18:49, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
Line 179: Line 167:


== Spoilers in featured article? ==
== Spoilers in featured article? ==
Europe and Australia havn't got Brawl and i feel its kinda a spoiler to featured Tabuu, i mean, c'mon, he's the final boss.
Europe and Australia havn't got Brawl and i feel its kinda a spoiler to featured Tabuu, i mean, c'mon, he's the final boss.
{{unsigned|Dancingcyberman}}
{{unsigned|Dancingcyberman}}
Line 188: Line 175:
::::It's not as if we can ban all Featured Articles about subjects that are spoilers. You understand that right?{{User:Knife/sig}} 17:25, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
::::It's not as if we can ban all Featured Articles about subjects that are spoilers. You understand that right?{{User:Knife/sig}} 17:25, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::Why don't you just put a spoiler template or notice on the top of the FA and call it a day? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:22, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::Why don't you just put a spoiler template or notice on the top of the FA and call it a day? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:22, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::We did that when Dimentio was an FA and Wayoshi got all bent out of shape about it. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 19:34, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::We did that when Dimentio was an FA and Wayoshi got all bent out of shape about it. -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 19:34, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::::It just messed up the format was all... {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 19:45, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
:::::::It just messed up the format was all... {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 19:45, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
::::::I thought we solved it by just putting in bolded text rather than the template... but then again I wasn't part of that discussion. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:42, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
::::::I thought we solved it by just putting in bolded text rather than the template... but then again I wasn't part of that discussion. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:42, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
And can we at least just change King Boo's image? V_V; {{User:Girrrtacos/sig}}
And can we at least just change King Boo's image? V_V; {{User:Girrrtacos/sig}}


What do you mean ''was'' the featured article?  It's still the FA!!-~~
What do you mean ''was'' the featured article?  It's still the FA!!-[[User:KP Blue|KP Blue]]
:I just noticed that myself. I still say FAs are a waste of time. -- [[File:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[File:Shyghost.PNG]] 00:52, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
 
==Da Da Da DAAAAAAA==
I wanted to officially (and pompously) announce my return to the wiki... you know, now that schools over. Hi everyone! - [[User:Ultimatetoad|Ultimatetoad]]
 
==Umm..==
Why were the pages {{fake link|Donkey Kong 64 DS}} and {{fake link|Waluigi's Hat}} deleted?{{user:theused/sig}}
 
:1. because there's no proof that Donkey Kong 64 DS exists.
<br>2. probably because it doesn't meet notability standards.
<br>if you can find some source that proves that a Donkey Kong 64 DS is in the works, I'm sure they won't delete the article about it. As for Waluigi's Hat, I doubt that page will remain unless Waluigi himself becomes more important.
[[User:Goomb-omb|Goomb-omb]] 17:36, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
::Post new topics at the bottom of the page. As a side not for Waluigi's Hat, it doesn't affect the gameplay, so no article is needed. {{User:Toadette 4evur/sig}}
:::Um is it enough proof when a magazine says that: '''''Nintendo wont be releasing Donkey Kong 64 on the virtual consol, they were thinking more in the DS direction.'''''? If so I'll try to find the source.{{user:theused/sig}}
 
==Quote of Day's Error==
hhhhmmmmm... an error appeared in one of the Quote of Days,
 
The error quote is:
 
“Goddess Palutena, victory is ours!The fight is on!!”
 
—PitPit, Super Smash Bros. BrawlSuper Smash Bros. Brawl
 
 
weird, PitPit :P
 
[[User:Shadowboo2800|Shadowboo2800]] 19:03, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
It appears that more than one quote template is used in the [[Pit]] article, resulting in an error Wayoshi had mentioned. Only one is allowed. However, if there's more than one quote, have the {{[[Template:quote2|quote2]]}} and slot it in. {{User:RAP/sig}}
:If I recall, I've used that template on a couple final smash articles to show what Sakurai's thoughts on them were, and they showed up on the main page, too.  Does that mean anything? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 13:33, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Well, having one than one {{[[Template:Quote|quote]]}} templates results in an automatic combination due to the DPL picking up everything that detects the quote in an article and shows it in the main page (or more precisely the template that shows it). {{User:RAP/sig}} [[Special:Contributions/RAP|I better move this talk page to an archive...]]
 
== Headline text ==
Hey, isn't my Proposal the latest one? If it says Latest Proposal, it should be the actual one, which is mine. Not that there was anything wrong with the currently showing one...
 
{{User:Dom/sig}} ''This is a life-or-death situation!''
 
:Feel free to update that template at [[template:proposal]]. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 10:50, 21 June 2008 (EDT)