Template talk:DrMarioSeries

Is this template ok? can i put it in all the games of the "series"?--Caith Sith 16:57, 11 October 2007 (EDT)

Looks fair, considering the templates we have on SML and SML2. Go for it. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:02, 11 October 2007 (EDT)

Missing info in Mariogames?

This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Also considering the possibility of editor oversight, shouldn't {{MarioGames}} contain what this template has in terms of games? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 00:35, 9 January 2016 (EST)

I support the proposed addition.

Shokora (talk · edits) 17:17, 1 August 2016 (EDT)

Merge with {{MarioGames}}

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, May 23, 2024, 08:27 GMT

Per comments above. Surely this template is the blue whale in the crowd in terms of consistency. Therefore, I propose we merge this template with {{MarioGames}} so as to allow individual templates on games in the Dr. Mario series to be created.

Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: July 29, 2019, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
2. Niiue (talk) Per proposal.
3. Bazooka Mario (talk) Assimilate the whale!
4. bwburke94 (talk) Per proposal.
5. BBQ Turtle (talk) Per all, this doesn't appear to be a particularly useful template.
6. TheDarkStar (talk) Per all, assimilate the whale.
7. Waluigi Time (talk) Not sure why this was made in the first place. The "related to the series" section seems like an attempt at justifying this template's existence by making it a little bit bigger, since no other game navbox does this.

Comments

I'm not so sure. Template redirects usually tend to be deleted. -- FanOfYoshi 02:22, July 15, 2019 (EDT)

I don't see why following policy and deleting template redirects is bad. Please explain. TheDarkStar 12:02, July 15, 2019 (EDT)