User talk:Scrooge200: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→SRoMG) |
Scrooge200 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::For starters, we should move "Super Mario Remaker" to the controversy page. | :::For starters, we should move "Super Mario Remaker" to the controversy page. | ||
::::Not sure on that one. It's officially acknowledged, but it's not so much a controversy. It could probably also go on the ''[[Super Mario Maker]]'' page, but this sounds like a discussion to bring up on [[Talk:List of Mario references on the Web]] if you really want to work on this. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 20:50, 9 September 2018 (EDT) | ::::Not sure on that one. It's officially acknowledged, but it's not so much a controversy. It could probably also go on the ''[[Super Mario Maker]]'' page, but this sounds like a discussion to bring up on [[Talk:List of Mario references on the Web]] if you really want to work on this. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 20:50, 9 September 2018 (EDT) | ||
::::Nah, I don't think I know enough about the majority of material on the page to work on it. The page is a mess, anyways, and it'd take a very long time to clean up. | |||
Revision as of 20:57, September 9, 2018
SRoMG
True, Slamacow and DanTDM could probably be removed. The YouTube Poops are pretty much widespread memes that they were officially acknowledged by the show writers, ergo making it noteworthy. SRoMG is fan-created and has nothing officially substantial about it, so it doesn't belong on the page. 
20:30, 9 September 2018 (EDT)
- Ah, okay. I'll remove Slamacow and DanTDM, along with SRoMG. I think the page should have guidelines, and we should at least set some obscurity limits.
- Page is already asking for a rewrite, so yeah, it definitely needs some work... 20:34, 9 September 2018 (EDT)
- For starters, we should move "Super Mario Remaker" to the controversy page.
- Not sure on that one. It's officially acknowledged, but it's not so much a controversy. It could probably also go on the Super Mario Maker page, but this sounds like a discussion to bring up on Talk:List of Mario references on the Web if you really want to work on this. 20:50, 9 September 2018 (EDT)
- Nah, I don't think I know enough about the majority of material on the page to work on it. The page is a mess, anyways, and it'd take a very long time to clean up.
- Not sure on that one. It's officially acknowledged, but it's not so much a controversy. It could probably also go on the Super Mario Maker page, but this sounds like a discussion to bring up on Talk:List of Mario references on the Web if you really want to work on this.
- For starters, we should move "Super Mario Remaker" to the controversy page.
- Page is already asking for a rewrite, so yeah, it definitely needs some work...
