MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/41: Difference between revisions

m
Archiving
No edit summary
m (Archiving)
Line 431: Line 431:


OK. This is soo confusing, but I agrer with the blue Toad being a separate character, it should also be said, to prove this idea that he '''isn't''' ALWAYS wearing glasses. Remember Super Mario Sunshine, I played it for first time  yesterday (lol, I am late) and the blue Toad there weren't wearing glasses, but I am.unsure if those guys are the same from the brigade...they have the same colors, so, I asssume they are. However I disagree with the second pary of the proposal: I think the Captain Toad isn't Toad at all. 3D qorld site '''called''' him Toad, but all CTTT website calls him Captain Toad. The offcial videos always referred to him as Captain Toad, etc. I agree for moving the 3D World info to Blue Toad, but not with the Captain Toad idea.{{User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig}}
OK. This is soo confusing, but I agrer with the blue Toad being a separate character, it should also be said, to prove this idea that he '''isn't''' ALWAYS wearing glasses. Remember Super Mario Sunshine, I played it for first time  yesterday (lol, I am late) and the blue Toad there weren't wearing glasses, but I am.unsure if those guys are the same from the brigade...they have the same colors, so, I asssume they are. However I disagree with the second pary of the proposal: I think the Captain Toad isn't Toad at all. 3D qorld site '''called''' him Toad, but all CTTT website calls him Captain Toad. The offcial videos always referred to him as Captain Toad, etc. I agree for moving the 3D World info to Blue Toad, but not with the Captain Toad idea.{{User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig}}
----
===Split all Smash Bros. special moves into separate articles===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">SPLIT 15-0</span>
The first article that really brought this to my attention was [[Falco_Lombardi#Special_Moves|Falco Lombardi's section]], because ''jesus'', but with five individual games to grab information and images from, the special moves for the Smash characters are starting to become a bit bloated. Not to Falco's extent, mind you, but nearly all of them have the potential to be as disorganized. The newest installment introduced two variant special moves for every special move as well, which just further stockpiles more words and images to the sections. It's gotten to the point where having individual articles for them is simply better for tidiness, but individual pages will also allow more fleshed-out explanations of the moves, including images from all the games, more detailed explanations of the moves' intricacies (without seeping too much into SSBWiki's level of detail), better explanations of differences between installments... Besides the fact that we're giving articles to every other Smash Bros. element under the sun, and the fact that we are certainly no stranger to [[List of special moves|special moves]] (case in point, we've given articles to everyone's individual [[Template:Mario Hoops 3-on-3|basketball dunks]]), and as mentioned in the [[MarioWiki:Coverage#Crossovers|coverage policy]], ''"everything appearing in the games gets articles"''... This is basically the next step. I'm aware of [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_10#Smash_Bros._Moves|the previous proposal]] to merge them all, but as evidenced by recent proposals, our standards for importance have changed.
'''Proposer''': {{User|Time Turner}}<br>
'''Deadline''': December 6, 2014, 23:59 GMT
====Support====
#{{User|Time Turner}} Per my proposal.
#{{User|Mario}} I've been wanting to do this for years. As 'kazo said at one point, the more articles, the better. We cover Smash Bros. ''fully''. We should cover all special moves and Final Smashes, especially since all are major aspects of Smash Bros. that are given a name. Hell, [[Air Dodge]], [[Shield]], and [[Footstool Jump]] all have articles. [[:Category:Super Smash Bros. Special Moves|This category]] shouldn't be bare as it is right now, and this proposal will answer questions our potential readers have raised. Also, for those who think we're becoming SmashWiki 2.0, actually, that's a slippery slope argument. SmashWiki talks about strategies, character viability, move viability, combo potential, DACUS, wave-dashing, SHFFL, famous competitive players, famous tourneys, palette swaps, Sakurai angles, and a ton other Smash Bros. jargon and nitty bitty mechanics we won't even breahte on. Special moves, on the other hand are a crucial aspect of Smash Bros. that all players are familiar with unlike the aforementioned crap I've listed. So, yeah, full support for this.
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per proposal, per policy. The 5th-level header clutter in History sections caused by the SSB Special Moves has bugged me for years, and now that we're giving all the SSB subjects articles again, splitting them out fixes both the clutter and the coverage gap. It ain't 2008 no more: the times have changed.
#{{User|Toadbrigade5}} If we are doing special moves from Mario:Rpg, we should do these games too.
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Yes please, per all.
#{{User|Boo4761}} Per all.
#{{User|Zakor1138}} Per all.
#{{User|3D Player 2004}} Per all.
#{{User|Sonic98}} Per all.
#{{User|Tails777}} Per all
#{{User|+-~Rosetta~-+}} Per all.
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all.
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} &mdash; Per Time Turner and Walkazo. This proposed policy falls within our coverage and will serve to better organize the wiki.
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per all.
#{{User|Glitchy Bowser Jr.}} Per all.
====Oppose====
====Comments====
----
----