Category talk:RPG characters

Necessity

Is this category really necessary? I mean, I just find it a bit odd that we have a category for a specific genre's characters when we don't have such a thing for the other genres (fighting, platform, racing, sports, etc.) All the articles that are in here already have a place in other, more specific categories, so it's not like this category's really doing much... Hello, I'm Time Turner.

100% agreed. Yoshi876 (talk)

I agree as well. -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 18:08, 4 August 2013 (EDT)

If the human characters from the Tennis/Golf don't get their special category, or if Waluigi/Toadette/Others don't get a category of spin-off exclusives, neither should RPG characters receive a category. Ray Trace^(T|C) 19:33, 4 August 2013 (EDT)

Per all, this category is redundant. I'd be happy to help with removing the links. GBAToad (talk) 20:02, 4 August 2013 (EDT)

I agree too, Start a TPP if you want.--

20:56, 4 August 2013 (EDT)

Delete Category: RPG Characters

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, June 2, 2024, 15:27 GMT

As I've said above, there's really no reason for this category to be. It's inconsistent categorize a certain genre's characters and not do the same for the other genres. Besides, this category isn't really necessary in the first place; all the articles in this category are already situated in more specific categories, such as Category:Mario & Luigi Series Characters, so it's not like RPG Characters is being used for articles that don't have a place elsewhere. Bottom line, this category should be deleted.

Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: August 19, 2013, 23:59 GMT

Delete

1. Time Turner (talk) Per proposal.
2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per all the comments above.
3. Driftmaster130 (talk) Per proposal.
4. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Pointless and inconsistent. Per all.
5. GBAToad (talk) Per all.
6. SuperYoshiBros (talk) Obviously. Per all.
7. Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk) Well, duh, why do we need duplicates?
8. Megadardery (talk) It's unnecessary to keep a meaningless category, while it's pages are already covered in other specific categories. As we can see there are already six subcategories, and this category is really unneeded. In other word: Per proposal
9. Baby Luigi (talk) Per all and my comment above
10. ParaLemmy1234 (talk) Per all
11. World10 (talk) Per all.