Template talk:Unblock

Deletion
If it's not used in over 3 months, should we delete it? Avengingbandit  08:25, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * I disagree. I think it should just be deleted now. -- Star phoria  15:17, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Why? There are good faith users who get blocked here. Avengingbandit  16:23, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * But none of them have the ability to edit their talk page, and it isn't necessary. Also, it isn't every day that someone gets blocked here, and it isn't often. And the only good faith editor who got blocked here that I can think of was Slipknot/Conker, who wasn't really editing in good faith anyway. Why is it necessary? I'm pretty much repeating what Mega and Havoc said on IRC. We aren't a bigger wiki, and there isn't really a need for it. I think it should be deleted. -- Star phoria  20:48, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Even if blocks on non-vandal users are nowhere near common in this wiki, there's really no harm to keep it. Blocks on good users are rare, but not non-existant. If this should be deleted, why not delete all the other unused templates shown here like Template:Blocked? It's necessity is on the template page. Avengingbandit  22:05, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * And also, usually users have the ability to edit their talk page. Avengingbandit  22:11, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
 * Well, some of those templates are image licensing templates, and need to stay for that reason. A couple of other templates there are necessary, but templates like "Blocked" should be deleted as well if not used. Also, if users wanted to be unblocked and had the ability to edit their talk page, why don't they just edit it? Half of the people who get blocked and can edit their talk page probably don't even know what a template is, if they want to be unblocked, they could just state their case on their talk page. A template isn't necessary. -- Star phoria  11:04, 11 April 2012 (EDT)