This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.
Since we now treat Monty Mole as derivative of Rocky Wrench, I thought perhaps it would be better to put Rocky at the forefront here (and while at it, include the non-Monty derivatives of Rocky from Galaxy). Like so. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:19, May 4, 2024 (EDT)
It's definitely fair game for the template title itself, but could "Rocky Wrenches and Monty Moles" potentially work as the navtemplate's header title? Some of our casual readers might not immediately understand the connection. (T|C) 23:26, May 4, 2024 (EDT)
I second "Rocky Wrenches and Monty Moles". We'd also have to rename Category:Monty Moles (as well as expand it to include Rocky Wrenches) to match. SolemnStormcloud (talk) 23:37, May 4, 2024 (EDT)
I mean, we could also just make a "category:Rocky Wrenches" and have "category:Monty Moles" be a subcategory of it, there's enough items. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:45, May 4, 2024 (EDT)
Yeah, that's probably better—"Category:Rocky Wrenches and Monty Moles" is a long title for a non-media category. SolemnStormcloud (talk) 00:33, May 5, 2024 (EDT)
I was just thinking this. Although, does it look a little odd to list Rocky Wrench under "Miscellaneous" when it's the parent species? Maybe change "Species" to "Rocky Wrench species" so "Miscellaneous" can be "Montys"? LinkTheLefty (talk) 16:00, May 12, 2024 (EDT)
Maybe just good ol' Moles at this point. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 16:11, May 12, 2024 (EDT)
Anyway now we run into this issue, that proposal that passed is turning out to be a pretty bad idea imo. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:24, May 12, 2024 (EDT)
We could nix the divergence in the template, like so...
(T|C) 23:26, May 4, 2024 (EDT)
