Editing Talk:Super Smash Bros. (series)

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{award-winner
|year=third
|#=8
|award=Series with Best Mulitplayer
|presenter=WarioLoaf
}}
You can's just copy to wikipedia site. There are templates and categories that do not apply to the Mario Wiki. --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 18:33, 11 May 2006 (EDT)
You can's just copy to wikipedia site. There are templates and categories that do not apply to the Mario Wiki. --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 18:33, 11 May 2006 (EDT)


Line 134: Line 140:
About time someone mentioned this; I'm sick of seeing all this Smash content, as if Smash is some kind of Mario spinoff. - [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]]
About time someone mentioned this; I'm sick of seeing all this Smash content, as if Smash is some kind of Mario spinoff. - [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]]


Is there a current stance on it? I think there have been a bunch of proposals recently. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:26, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
== Persona ==


== Persona ==
{{talk}}


:''...music from [[Wikipedia:Persona 4|Persona 4]] and [[Wikipedia:Persona 3|Persona 3]]''
:''...music from [[Wikipedia:Persona 4|Persona 4]] and [[Wikipedia:Persona 3|Persona 3]]''
Line 145: Line 151:


== Chart Proposal: Add Roster Numbers to the Playable Characters Chart ==
== Chart Proposal: Add Roster Numbers to the Playable Characters Chart ==
{{SettledTPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|1-5|Don't add}}
I am doing a chart proposal for the playable characters in this article. I know that we have a bunch of playable characters that are in the entire ''Super Smash Bros.'' series including ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' that are getting close to less than 100 as of right now. Since ''Ultimate'' managed to give roster numbers for every playable fighters in ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'', I think by adding the roster number into the chart would help the readers since we definitely know which characters by which number they appear since the checkmarks and Xs were used for the all the games and are only listed in alphabetical order instead of organized by the roster order.  
I am doing a chart proposal for the playable characters in this article. I know that we have a bunch of playable characters that are in the entire ''Super Smash Bros.'' series including ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'' that are getting close to less than 100 as of right now. Since ''Ultimate'' managed to give roster numbers for every playable fighters in ''Super Smash Bros. Ultimate'', I think by adding the roster number into the chart would help the readers since we definitely know which characters by which number they appear since the checkmarks and Xs were used for the all the games and are only listed in alphabetical order instead of organized by the roster order.  


Line 341: Line 346:
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} That can go on SmashWiki.
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} That can go on SmashWiki.
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Scrooge, this only applies to one game so far.
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per Scrooge, this only applies to one game so far.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Per all.
#{{User|1337star}} This idea isn't future-proofed. What would we do if/when the next ''Smash'' game introduces new characters but doesn't use ''Ultimate'''s roster numbers?


===Comments===
===Comments===
I quickly checked Smash Wiki, and they decided not to use the numbers except for in the introductions of their Smash Ultimate character articles. Thus, I don't think this proposal can be opposed on the basis of it belonging on Smash Wiki. (This [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter#Add_fighter_numbers|talk section]] states this directly, linking to this [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter/Archive_3#Fighter_Numbers|talk section]], which shows the debate but not a decision. I'm assuming that a decision was reached on another page somewhere.) [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 20:27, October 3, 2020 (EDT)
I quickly checked Smash Wiki, and they decided not to use the numbers except for in the introductions of their Smash Ultimate character articles. Thus, I don't think this proposal can be opposed on the basis of it belonging on Smash Wiki. (This [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter#Add_fighter_numbers|talk section]] states this directly, linking to this [[smashwiki:Talk:Fighter/Archive_3#Fighter_Numbers|talk section]], which shows the debate but not a decision. I'm assuming that a decision was reached on another page somewhere.) [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 20:27, October 3, 2020 (EDT)
==Current stance on Smash content on MarioWiki?==
What's the current stance on whether to add/remove/edit/change all the Smash information on this wiki? I've seen quite a few proposals/discussions but nothing conclusive. I think we're well past the period where Smash was considered a Mario spinoff by some people, and none of the other Nintendo or NIWA wikis do the same. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:29, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
:The most recent proposal on it ended in favor of keeping our current coverage the same. Also, we don't do things just because other wikis do or don't do them a certain way. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 13:35, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
:: Understood, I think that what the wiki already does, namely referring to Smash as "Mario-related media" rather than "Mario series" and clearly stating that it's not a Mario spinoff, may do the job. For reference, Serebii (the most popular Pokémon fansite) also has a page on every Smash fighter and it's weird af, so I guess it is a case of different sites doing their own thing. Do you have a link to the proposal, though? I'm interested in reading what people had to say. --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 13:54, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
:::[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_56#Remove_non-Mario_characters_from_the_trophies,_Assist_Trophy,_stickers,_and_Spirit_pages|Sure, here it is.]] It's a bit of a long read, Smash coverage is a pretty heated topic around here. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:00, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
::::Thanks, I think I had a look at it but I think it excluded any decisions on the fighter pages themselves. Though imo I think the wiki is doing a good job already of establishing that Smash is ''not'' a Mario spinoff (especially compared to how it used to be), but like I said on the board maybe more can be done too? I'm thinking maybe an "external crossovers" category that covers any crossovers that aren't part of the Mario franchise or its true spinoffs (not just Smash but also Fortune Street, Captain N, etc.) --[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 14:05, July 15, 2021 (EDT)
:::::Yeah, going all-or-nothing in a proposal like this doesn't end well so usually they're limited to trimming only certain parts of Smash coverage. I assume that if this proposal had passed then other aspects of the series would've been re-assessed at a later time. You could start a proposal about your external crossovers idea if you want. Also, you might be interested in reading [[MarioWiki:Coverage]] which explains how we handle stuff like this. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:17, July 15, 2021 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)