Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Lakitu

__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=22:40, 9 November 2012
|lastedit=23:40, 8 January 2013
|nosupport=true
}}
==== Support ====
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} I have nominated this article for refeaturing for many reasons. First, I made sure that there were no red links. Second, I double checked for spelling errors and made sure there were no boxes requesting that the article should be fixed. This article meets all requirements for featuring and is a perfect article to be featured.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}}
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}

==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} to many short section such as the Super-Mario-Kun section reading that section didn't inform me of there specific role
#{{User|Daisyluva99}} A number of sections are short, and I am disappionted about this
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Short sections, missing information (ex. Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix)

==== Removal of Opposes ====

==== Comments ====
{{User|Daisyluva99}} Still too many short sections. This really needs to be fixed.

{{User|Mariobros1985}} Notes: I have changed the red link "Blooming Lakitus" so that it is now bold and does not appear as a red link. *Update* As of 11/26/12, Lakitu is being supported 3-0, so I don't see how this could be considered a FA failure. 12/2/12 Update: I don't understand how the Super Mario-Kun section is insufficient; first of all, I looked it up and Lakitu never has a major role. Second, the article already states that Lakitu appears as an enemy in some of the issues, and a referee in others.
:I'm sorry what issues does Lakitu appear in? how does it act as an enemy? these are questions that the article does not answer. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}}

{{user|Meester Tweester}} Very informative, but too many red links in the [[New Super Mario Bros. U]] section. I'm undecided.
{{User|Mariobros1985}} The red links have been fixed now.